Talk:Finger - Revision history

Edmund: /* Lecturer's comment */

2016-12-19T14:47:49Z

Lecturer's comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:47, 19 December 2016
Line 90:		Line 90:

	==Lecturer's comment==		==Lecturer's comment==
	Would expect also explanations in next of examples. Currently there is quite hard to understand the meaning of used parameters. Also connection with sysadmin everyday's work would be expected with relevant examples, e.g. also remote usage etc. When there are written several parameters then it would be also interesting to know how to use them in sysadmin point of view. When article itself is in English then review would be also expected in same language to ensure that author can understand it properly.		The article is relatively modest. Would expect also explanations in next of examples. Currently there is quite hard to understand the meaning of used parameters. Also connection with sysadmin everyday's work would be expected with relevant examples, e.g. also remote usage etc. When there are written several parameters then it would be also interesting to know how to use them in sysadmin point of view. When article itself is in English then review would be also expected in same language to ensure that author can understand it properly.

Edmund at 14:47, 19 December 2016

2016-12-19T14:47:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:47, 19 December 2016
Line 86:		Line 86:
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}



			==Lecturer's comment==
			Would expect also explanations in next of examples. Currently there is quite hard to understand the meaning of used parameters. Also connection with sysadmin everyday's work would be expected with relevant examples, e.g. also remote usage etc. When there are written several parameters then it would be also interesting to know how to use them in sysadmin point of view. When article itself is in English then review would be also expected in same language to ensure that author can understand it properly.

Jkuzmin at 18:39, 8 December 2016

2016-12-08T18:39:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, 8 December 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Author: Jevgeni Kuzmin		Author: Jevgeni Kuzmin <br/>
	Group: A21		Group: A21

Jkuzmin at 18:37, 8 December 2016

2016-12-08T18:37:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 8 December 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Author: Jevgeni Kuzmin
			Group: A21

			Hinnang oli tehtud 8.12.16 kell 20:30

	{\| class="wikitable" border="1"		{\| class="wikitable" border="1"
	\|-		\|-

Jkuzmin at 18:36, 8 December 2016

2016-12-08T18:36:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 8 December 2016
Line 72:		Line 72:
	\| 1		\| 1
	\| Töö on kirjutatud inglise keeles, loodan, et koik on õigesti kirjutatud		\| Töö on kirjutatud inglise keeles, loodan, et koik on õigesti kirjutatud
	\| -		\|

	\|-		\|-

Jkuzmin: Created page with "{| class="wikitable" border="1" |- ! KRITEERIUM ! KAAL ! HINNANG ! SELGITUS |- |- | Skoop | 0,5 | 0,5 | Sisaldab piisavalt infot esmakasutajale. |- |- | Artikli..."

2016-12-08T18:34:04Z

Created page with "{| class="wikitable" border="1" |- ! KRITEERIUM ! KAAL ! HINNANG ! SELGITUS |- |- | Skoop | 0,5 | 0,5 | Sisaldab piisavalt infot esmakasutajale. |- |- | Artikli..."

New page

{| class="wikitable" border="1"
|-
! KRITEERIUM
! KAAL
! HINNANG
! SELGITUS
|-

|-
| Skoop
| 0,5
| 0,5
| Sisaldab piisavalt infot esmakasutajale.
|-

|-
| Artikli tutvustus ja versioon
| 0,5
| 0,5
| Artikli tutvustus on lühike ja konkreetne
|-

|-
| Sissejuhatus
| 0,5
| 0,2
| Sissejuhatus võiks olla suurem
|-

|-
| Tehniliselt korrektne
| 1
| 1
| Tehniliselt tundub kõik korras olevat.
|-

|-
| Kasutatud kirjandus
| 0,5
| 0,5
| Viidatud kirjandus on olemas.
|-

|-
| Näited kasutamiseks/käsud
| 1
| 0,4
| Näited saaks rohkem olla
|-

|-
| Sisu
| 4
| 3,5
| Sisu võiks alati rohkem olla, aga põhiline on välja toodud, vähemalt esmaseks tutvumiseks.
|-

|-
| Ülesehitus
| 1
| 1
| Peatükid on loogilises järjekorras.
|-

|-
| Kirjavead ja õigekiri
| 1
| 1
| Töö on kirjutatud inglise keeles, loodan, et koik on õigesti kirjutatud
| -

|-
| Kokku
| 10
| 8,6
|
|-
|}