User:Eocakovs: Difference between revisions
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Innovative - no other popular program like this | | Innovative - no other popular program like this | ||
| Strong team - well organized, good | | | ||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| Strong team - well organized, good | |||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| Competitively priced | | Competitively priced | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |||
|- | |||
| User-friendly interface | | User-friendly interface | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 11:46, 17 February 2017
I701 - Information System Analysis
Group Project
Members
- Ardi Vaba
- Pascal Tietjen
- Peep Kuulme
- Nika Ptskialadze
- Erik Ocakovskih
- Frank Korving
Organization
WPE (Windows Programs Explained)
Daily Operations:
We are a software development company. Our current major project consists of providing and supporting an application with simple interface to analyze currently installed programs on the system.
Example Information Systems:
Accounting Information System
Customer Support Information System
Sales Information System
Developer Daily-Work Information System
Transaction Processing Information System
Value Chain Analysis
Primary Activities:
Direct
- Software Development [Getting the software to working state]
- Software Delivery [Getting the product to the market]
- Sales [Selling a product to current customers and new customer aquisition]
- Marketing [Providing product information to target group]
Indirect
- Scheduling [Optimizing work and workload assignments]
- Support / Service [Maintenance of existing software and customer assistance]
- Marketing [Customer Management]
Quality Assurance
- Testing [Functionality verification of the developed working software]
Support Activities:
Direct
- Infrastructure [Providing Legal, Administrative and Accounting support]
- Procurement [Acquisition of external services]
Indirect
- HR Management [Human Resource Management]
IT SWOT
Strength | Weakness | Opportunities | Threats |
---|---|---|---|
Innovative - no other popular program like this | |||
Strong team - well organized, good | |||
Competitively priced | |||
User-friendly interface |
Weakness
No brand recognition
Small company not a lot of financial backup
Developlment slow due to the size of the company
Organic growth - no outside funding
Opportunities
Globally extending
Expand the team for faster development
Targeting industries
Threats
Larger company might sprint past with a similar program
Sustainable financial backing
Customer scepticisim - do not want to give access to scan their computer