User:Eocakovs: Difference between revisions
Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
===Requirements=== | ===Requirements=== | ||
====Functional==== | ====Functional==== | ||
Users should be able to scan their computer and check for installed programs | |||
Users should be able to gain information on these installed programs through us (WPE) | |||
Users should be able to delete the application | |||
Users should be able to request suggestions on alternative | |||
Users should be able to search for similar applications | |||
Users should be able to search for any application | |||
Users should be able to submit their rating/opinion to be reviewed by us | |||
Companies should be able to | |||
====Non-Functional==== | ====Non-Functional==== |
Revision as of 11:08, 3 March 2017
I701 - Information System Analysis
Group Project
Members
- Ardi Vaba
- Pascal Tietjen
- Peep Kuulme
- Nika Ptskialadze
- Erik Ocakovskih
- Frank Korving
Organization
WPE (Windows Programs Explained)
Daily Operations:
We are a software development company. Our current major project consists of providing and supporting an application with simple interface to analyze currently installed programs on the system.
Example Information Systems:
Accounting Information System
Customer Support Information System
Sales Information System
Developer Daily-Work Information System
Transaction Processing Information System
Value Chain Analysis
Primary Activities:
Direct
- Software Development [Getting the software to working state]
- Software Delivery [Getting the product to the market]
- Sales [Selling a product to current customers and new customer aquisition]
- Marketing [Providing product information to target group]
Indirect
- Scheduling [Optimizing work and workload assignments]
- Support / Service [Maintenance of existing software and customer assistance]
- Marketing [Customer Management]
Quality Assurance
- Testing [Functionality verification of the developed working software]
Support Activities:
Direct
- Infrastructure [Providing Legal, Administrative and Accounting support]
- Procurement [Acquisition of external services]
Indirect
- HR Management [Human Resource Management]
IT SWOT
Strength | Weakness | Opportunities | Threats |
---|---|---|---|
Innovative - no other popular program like this | No brand recognition | Globally extending | Larger company might sprint past with a similar program |
Strong team - well organized, good | Small company not a lot of financial backup | Expand the team for faster development | Sustainable financial backing |
Competitively priced | Development slow due to the size of the company | Targeting industries | Customer scepticisim - do not want to give access to scan their computer |
User-friendly interface | Organic growth - no outside funding |
Improvements
Problems:
- Application Information
- Due to lack of program information / Methods of updating
- Trustworthiness / Unknown Sources
- Customer Perception of the Products [Solution should provide: Transparency for customers / Awareness of Application]
- Market access / interactions
Short Information System Description
Information System will provide Windows OS users with detailed information on their installed packages and applications. Provided information will include trustworthiness / rating / availability / checksum / developer details of the application. System will incentivize users and developers to submit descriptions of applications, which would go through a review process before publication. Companies can become verified by us through a paid application verification process thereby granting "trust-ability" to these applications and their developers.
Requirements
Functional
Users should be able to scan their computer and check for installed programs Users should be able to gain information on these installed programs through us (WPE) Users should be able to delete the application Users should be able to request suggestions on alternative Users should be able to search for similar applications Users should be able to search for any application Users should be able to submit their rating/opinion to be reviewed by us
Companies should be able to