The History And Impact Of YouTube: Difference between revisions

From ICO wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
Tarwal (talk | contribs)
38 edits
Tarwal (talk | contribs)
38 edits
Line 11: Line 11:


===The first video debate===
===The first video debate===
Most people would agree that the first YouTuber (a holder of a YouTube account) of sorts was Jawed Karim with his revolutionary 18-second first video which he called “Me at the zoo” which was released on the 24th of April 2005 [3].<ref name="meatthezoo">J. Karim, "Me at the zoo," Youtube, [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNQXAC9IVRw. [Accessed 28 4 2022].</ref> The videos showed Jawed at the San Diego Zoo standing in front of a cage of elephants with him talking about the elephants.<ref name="meatthezoo"></ref> The video currently stands having 221,032,051 views and 11 million likes.
Most people would agree that the first YouTuber (a holder of a YouTube account) of sorts was Jawed Karim with his revolutionary 18-second first video which he called “Me at the zoo” which was released on the 24th of April 2005.<ref name="meatthezoo">J. Karim, "Me at the zoo," Youtube, [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNQXAC9IVRw. [Accessed 28 4 2022].</ref> The videos showed Jawed at the San Diego Zoo standing in front of a cage of elephants with him talking about the elephants.<ref name="meatthezoo"></ref> The video currently stands having 221,032,051 views and 11 million likes.
However, evidence suggests that this was probably the 6th video uploaded to YouTube. The earliest YouTube account seems to be held by another channel called “COM-TEST” which released 5 videos “com-test”, “com-test1”, “com-test3”, com-test4” and “com-test5”.<ref name="zoonotfirst">T. Realm, "Me at the zoo wasn't the first video," [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EurHP1DCJg. [Accessed 28 4 2022].</ref> It is theorized that these videos were uploaded just to test the working of YouTube’s playback system. We must also note the absence of “com-test2” suggesting that there was a way to edit channel videos and delete videos. There is, however, no way to view these videos as these videos have been deleted ever since. However, this is just a theory considering that the original Reddit account containing this information has now been hacked and the information has been deleted.
However, evidence suggests that this was probably the 6th video uploaded to YouTube. The earliest YouTube account seems to be held by another channel called “COM-TEST” which released 5 videos “com-test”, “com-test1”, “com-test3”, com-test4” and “com-test5”.<ref name="zoonotfirst">T. Realm, "Me at the zoo wasn't the first video," [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EurHP1DCJg. [Accessed 28 4 2022].</ref> It is theorized that these videos were uploaded just to test the working of YouTube’s playback system. We must also note the absence of “com-test2” suggesting that there was a way to edit channel videos and delete videos. There is, however, no way to view these videos as these videos have been deleted ever since. However, this is just a theory considering that the original Reddit account containing this information has now been hacked and the information has been deleted.


Revision as of 17:49, 28 April 2022

History

YouTube

YouTube is a Social media and video sharing platform with over an estimated 2.24 billion users as of 2021 and more than 22.8 billion monthly visits making it the 2nd most popular website in the world following Google.com. Owned by Google currently, it was created by three former employees of PayPal Jawed Karim, Steve Chen, and Chad Hurley.[1][2]

Original Idea

The original idea behind YouTube was a start-up idea called Tune In which was meant to be a dating platform where users could upload videos.[3] The product however was extremely primitive to the point that users could not specify which videos they wanted to see, it was completely random. However, the idea did not catch any traction and the site had very few visitors.[3] The creators of the website even tried to pay women to create channels and upload “dating videos” but no one took them up on their offer.[3] Eventually, the creators of the website noticed that the users of the website were not using it for its intended purpose but were using it to upload videos of their personal life such as “dogs, vacations, anything”.[3] This inspired the creators of YouTube to make it a more general website instead, redesigning it to be a general-purpose video sharing platform and social media platform. This approach of theirs was successful and gave birth to the current idea of YouTube.[3] The co-founder of YouTube Jawed Karim has also gone on record to say that his idea of YouTube was also inspired by “Nipplegate” and how when it happened, he noticed that it was incredibly hard to find videos of Janet Jackson online during the “Nipplegate” event.[4]

The first video debate

Most people would agree that the first YouTuber (a holder of a YouTube account) of sorts was Jawed Karim with his revolutionary 18-second first video which he called “Me at the zoo” which was released on the 24th of April 2005.[5] The videos showed Jawed at the San Diego Zoo standing in front of a cage of elephants with him talking about the elephants.[5] The video currently stands having 221,032,051 views and 11 million likes. However, evidence suggests that this was probably the 6th video uploaded to YouTube. The earliest YouTube account seems to be held by another channel called “COM-TEST” which released 5 videos “com-test”, “com-test1”, “com-test3”, com-test4” and “com-test5”.[6] It is theorized that these videos were uploaded just to test the working of YouTube’s playback system. We must also note the absence of “com-test2” suggesting that there was a way to edit channel videos and delete videos. There is, however, no way to view these videos as these videos have been deleted ever since. However, this is just a theory considering that the original Reddit account containing this information has now been hacked and the information has been deleted.

Acquisition by Google

Google acquired YouTube on the 13th of November 2006. It acquired YouTube for the hefty price of 1.65 billion dollars.[7] The actual announcement occurred on the 9th of October 2006.[8] This has turned out to be a splendid move on Google’s part. In advertisement revenue alone, YouTube has generated around 20 billion dollars in 2020, this number was around 8 billion dollars in 2017.[7]

YouTube Viacom Lawsuit

On March 13th, 2007, Viacom launched a lawsuit against YouTube for 1 billion dollars claiming copyright infringement. Viacom claimed that YouTube had committed “brazen” copyright infringement from over 150,000 clips from Viacom TV shows and that the clips had been seen 1.5 billion times.[9] The event was extremely important in YouTube’s history as it had set a legal precedent. During the trial, Viacom won a court ruling which forced YouTube to reveal private data about its users including the viewing habits of every website that had ever used YouTube, the move was heavily criticized as a backward step in privacy rights. Viacom gave in to the criticism and allowed YouTube to anonymize the data before handing it over.[10][11] YouTube’s defense was that the DMCA safe harbor provision exempted them from any incurred liability.[12] This even gave birth to the YouTube content ID system which allows media companies to register their content on a database that is used to check any newly uploaded videos for any cases of copyright infringement. YouTube’s victory, in this case, set a precedent for the protection of the video streaming rights of the internet in totality.

YouTube partner program

In December 2007, YouTube introduced the partner program.[13] This meant that now, popular creators on the platform could monetize their videos. This meant now that certain YouTube users started earning money for their videos, which led to YouTube now being taken seriously as a profession. In the early days, creators could not get monetized on their own, they had to join an MCN(Multi-channel network) to get monetized and use custom thumbnails.[14] On the 13th of April 2012, YouTube lets anyone (in a list of 20 countries) be monetized even those who are not huge YouTubers.[15] YouTubers no longer had to work under a multi-channel network and could directly get revenue from YouTube. The primary focus of multi-channel networks now became to provide partnered YouTubers with copyright protection.[15] The increase in inclusion of anyone in its partner program incentivized the release of fresh ideas and content with good production values, it also ushered in a new wave of YouTubers who would upload regularly. YouTube as of the 23rd of August 2021 has over 2 million YouTube creators in its YouTube partner program.[16]

Multi-Channel Networks

According to YouTube support, Multi-Channel Networks are “third-party services that affiliate with YouTube channels to offer services that may include audience development, content programming, digital rights management, monetization, and/or sales.” Multi-Channel Networks offer creators many benefits, such as a community of other creators to collaborate and to have better ad revenue and sales opportunities with brands.[17] In the earlier days of YouTube (2007-2012), a channel could not be monetized unless it was part of a multi-channel network, which is why some of YouTube’s earliest creators are signed with Multi-Channel Networks such as FullScreen, Maker, Machinima, revelmode, etc.[14] However now, when everyone can be monetized, Multi-Channel Networks cannot offer the same kind of benefits as they used to, or more appropriately, there is not much of a reason to join a multi-channel network except for the fact that they can provide you with legal protection. It is not recommended to join a Multi-Channel Network as a YouTuber however, considering the thousands of stories of YouTubers getting duped by their Multi-Channel Network. One of the biggest of such cases is Defy Media, whose owner ran away with 1.7 million dollars of revenue stolen from 50 creators.[18] Defy media also scammed the owner of Smosh media Anthony Padilla by coaxing him to accept stock in the company in exchange for the Smosh brand, Defy media never went public which meant that the stock that Smosh had was completely valueless [19].[19] The problem with joining a multi-channel network is the complete lack of accountability on the part of the multi-channel networks which have no authoritative bodies regulating their behavior.

Lets plays

The genesis of monetization on YouTube was marked by the great boom of the category of Gaming, and within the genre of Gaming, specifically, the category of Lets plays. The first lets plays on the site were made in the form of walkthroughs, where the video creator would guide you through the game unedited to show you how to get through certain levels, this slowly progressed to people adding commentary to their performance and people started being watched either because they were entertaining or because they were good at the game.[20] This often gave a great deal of publicity to the game and boosted game sales. Gaming and YouTube are incredibly intertwined with some of the biggest YouTubers such as PewDiePie, JackSepticEye, Markiplier, Vanoss Gaming, WoodysGamerTag, etc. having their roots in Gaming content.

1st Adpocalypse

With the growing popularity of YouTube, it was inevitable that questionable content would eventually come under the scrutiny of major advertisers such as Disney, Coca-cola, Dr. Pepper, Johnson and Johnson, the UK government, etc. YouTube attempted to steer its site towards a more family-oriented platform and modified the algorithm to favor and promote such content. However, the major trigger that manifested the situation in February 2017 was the biggest YouTuber on the platform making a video reacting to jokes that could be perceived as discriminatory in nature but were jokes nonetheless. Many major news publications mainly the Wall Street Journal caught wind of the video and portrayed him as a white supremacist and an antisemite, the topic became a mainstream talking point, the result of which major advertisers were practically forced to withdraw their support of YouTube.[21] Another event that happened in close proximity of this event was an incident when Pepsi uploaded an advertisement that showed Kendall Jenner walking through a group of protesters that were protesting against police brutality, the conclusion being that she hands a Pepsi can to the police officer thus quelling the turmoil between the two groups. The advertisement garnered a lot of criticism both online and offline pointing out that it was trivializing the entire movement.[22] This marked the end of all Pepsi ads on YouTube. The word adpocalypse itself was coined to represent the boycotting of advertisements by Major Companies. The 1st adpocalypse introduced the system of demonetization. This meant that YouTube now had systems in place to demonetize a video if it was related to any controversial video or contained any “non-family-friendly” content.[23] This effort was made by YouTube to try and prevent any further incidents.

2nd Adpocalypse

The second adpocalypse occurred on the 31st of December 2017 when popular internet celebrity Logan Paul released a video of his trip to Japan, in this video, he films himself in Aokigahara, or ‘the suicide forest’ where he shows the body of a recently deceased Japanese man who had died after hanging himself from a tree.[24] The event triggered a lot of controversy and the YouTube introduced a new policy. The policy included increased the requirements necessary to join the YouTube partner program, creators now had to have at least 1000 subscribers and 4000 hours worth of watch time to be eligible for partnership.[25] Due to this course of action, thousands of creators worldwide lost their monetization overnight.

3rd Adpocalypse

The second adpocalypse was caused single-handedly due to a man named Matt Watson who on Feb 19 2019 made a stream regarding a huge problem regarding YouTube’s algorithm and how it promoted pedophiles. Matt on stream went on to show how if one started watching videos showing little girls, it was very likely that YouTube would start recommending videos that had very dubious intent behind it and was clearly paedophilic in nature.[26] However, instead of letting YouTube fix the issue. Matt decided to alert news publications regarding his discovery. This resulted in the 2nd adpocalypse, huge corporations that had just recently started pooling their ads into YouTube were forced into removing ads once again. The outcome of this event was disastrous. YouTube panicked and started to ban all comments on YouTube videos containing minors, in a single day thousands of comments were deleted are currently being deleted to this day on videos containing a minor regardless of the context.[27]

Introduction of shorts

“Shorts is a new short-form video experience for creators and artists who want to shoot short, catchy videos using nothing but their mobile phones.” This format of video platforming was pioneered by Vine and then popularised by other apps like musical.ly and TikTok. YouTube first launched the beta edition of Shorts in India on the 14th of September 2020 shortly after India banned TikTok on the 14th of September 2020.[28][29] Soon afterward, YouTube launched Shorts in the U.S.A on the 18th of March 2021, the move was incredibly successful and the feature stuck permanently.[28]

How Youtube Works

Social Impact

Since the beginning of YouTube, it has been an influence on our society, acquiring a major impact through the passing of the years, reaching today’s mark of more than 800 million unique user visits to the search engine monthly.[30] One of the greatest contributing factors to this number is the vast amount of diverse content produced on YouTube daily, ranging from educational videos to humoristic entertainment, political campaigns, social movements, music, videogames, health, and much more. It is important to note that as much as YouTube can have a positive impact on society, it can generate the opposite effect, and harm society in multiple ways, one of them being the spread of false information. Critics state that YouTube’s extreme freedom when publishing videos works as a double-edged sword by allowing the spread of misinformation with little to no consequences.[31] YouTube’s impact on society can be divided into several sections:

Communities

One of the most important aspects of life is socialization, which normally would be with groups with similar interests. These groups with one or more common interests are called Communities. Communities are critical because they are often an important source of social connections and a sense of belonging, and the absence of communities in a person’s life can lead to serious mental health issues.[32]

YouTube nowadays plays a very important role in this aspect. Once again, thanks to the immense variety of content, communities of all types, forms, and sizes have formed. These communities are an important resource for individuals who are part of underrepresented groups and may not have access to or feel comfortable in traditional organizations rooted in inequity. [33]

The effect these communities have is one of auto-development in which thanks to the publishing of content, the community grows and grows in a steady manner, allowing to attract new members as well to keep the veterans. Benefits of communities include a support network, professional development, sense of purpose, new inspiration and ideas, and greater resilience among many others.

Education

YouTube videos have had a major role in students learning abilities, becoming the best and most popular source of educational video content. It is constantly used by institutions, teachers, and students to upload videos with academic material, as well as homework and any other video and sound resource.[34] Most educational institutes and organizations also record their lessons and lectures as videos and upload them to YouTube. This has completely changed the way of teaching as well as studying.[35] Previously it was extremely important to take notes in a classroom, but now that doesn’t matter because one student can repeat the lecture as many times as he/she wants.

KHAN Academy Logo [36]

Khan Academy and YouTube

Khan Academy has a well-established presence as one of the most popular non-profit education schools. It is well established among different social media, but it has a major impact on YouTube, having more than 7.12 million subscribers (February 2022). The channel has playlists of Maths, Chemistry, Biology, Arts and Humanities, Science &Engineering, Computing, Economics & finance. All these playlists are constantly used in schools all around the world to teach a variety of subjects. [37] Another important mention concerning the impact of Youtube and Khan Academy is a study that shows that “Use of Khan Academy was positively associated with better than predicted test scores, lower math anxiety, and higher confidence in one’s ability to do the math.” [38]

Independent Educational Youtubers

Education is not only available through Organizations or schools themselves, but there is a great variety of individuals whose channels are dedicated to education.

3blue1brown, by Grant Sanderson, is a channel dedicated to math problems, linear algebra, neural networks, calculus, quantum mechanics, etc. 3blue1brown videos use a special animation engine created by him which further increases the quality of his videos and help his channel become one of the best educational sources in Youtube according to diverse surveys.[39]

Numberphile is a popular math YouTube channel created by Brady Haron. His videos are composed by all sorts of mathematical concepts which often feature mathematicians and other experts in different math fields. Other important educational channels include Socratica, Mathologer, The Organic Chemistry Tutor, Julioprofe, Math TV, kurtzgesagt, etc.

Politics

Many politicians all around the world have used YouTube as the main form of communication for the promotion of their campaigns, replacing tv commercials and direct mail for ads and videos. It has also been used to promote several other political groups, including extremist content, far-right and conspiracy propaganda, rebellious groups, and others. It is important to note that it has been proven that YouTube’s recommendation algorithm [40] tends to recommend extremist content, far-right, and conspiracy propaganda. This has led to claims that YouTube has been used as a tool for political radicalization.

YouTube became more important in politics by 2008 when the political landscape started a major shift by having seven of the sixteen presidential candidates announcing their campaigns on YouTube. Right after, many tests showed that the videos affected popular perception much more than direct mail.[41]

By 2009 several entities such as the U.S. Congress and the Vatican used YouTube to disseminate information. By 2012, Obama’s re-election campaign included 30 staff working on YouTube.

Since Obama’s rise to the presidency, YouTube has been a major tool for the dissemination of information for every branch of the U.S. government. Other governments would follow the same standard right after if they were not already doing it.

Many other important political social movements owe a great part of their influence to YouTube, some examples include the Arab Spring, Hannan’s radical libertarian politics, Bassem Youssef, Mocking of Presidential elections in Russia, etc.

Advertising and Marketing

YouTube brought a new way of advertisement. Instead of sitting through annoying commercials when watching television, people would go to YouTube and click on adverts themselves. This is because of the new method of marketing developed, in which, instead of forcing people to forcefully watch adverts, now you must pull people toward it. This change made brands try to connect with people associating common interests with their products, such as Red Bull with their extreme sports commercials or Nike with football.

Another change was in the length of adverts. Previously on tv adverts were normally 30 seconds long, with YouTube the length has extended to 3 minutes, normally the 3-minute advert being an extension of the 30 seconds one.

Another important change is to partner and sponsor programs with YouTubers. YouTube channels today offer advertisers more guaranteed reachability to a specific public, which previously could not be done on tv.

Note that YouTube also has 30 seconds average adverts in videos that can be both skippable and not and are found in any part of a video. These adverts have not brought a major impact of any kind since they are similar to tv adverts.

Living off Youtube

The greatest impact of YouTube is the creation of a new form of living which normally includes winning money by working on your hobby, something you like doing. YouTube has a “Partner Program” which is an ad-revenue-sharing arrangement started in 2007. This program allows for any person lucky or skilled enough to win money in exchange of views and adverts on their videos.[42]

Today, there are thousands of YouTubers living off Youtube as their main source of income, with the top ones winning more than one million USD dollars a month. [43]

This new model of job has brought a major change in the work. It gives everyone the opportunity to try, anyone can upload almost anything to YouTube, for free, and be in the chance of making a living off it. This brings a new wave of thought in which it is not necessary to go to university and get a standard 8-hour job. [44]

Political Impact

Guidelines

The main purpose of YouTube’s community guidelines particularly schemes for their community. These guidelines are supposed to protect the general community that uses its services, and these guidelines dictate what videos are eligible and those that are not eligible for general consumption.

Sensitive Content

On a surface level, YouTube like any other mainstream media company, at least in recent years, prefers an output of family-friendly consumable content. This means that YouTube censors a lot of “inappropriate” content, as this could include pornography, racial profanity, graphic violence, child protection, and speech that is considered to be hate speech. This is accomplished by the combination of human moderators who flag the video, regular watchers who also flag the video, and automated algorithms that work on the principle of machine learning.[45]

Firearms and Regulated Goods

YouTube in accordance with its family-friendly image, takes an anti-gun and anti-drug stance and does not promote:[46][47]

Firearm [48]
  • The direct sale of firearms
  • Instruction on the creation of firearms, ammunition, homemade suppressors, etc.
  • Instruction on converting a firearm into an automatic one
  • The sale of or linking of regulated goods. Regulated goods can include:
    • Alcohol
    • Nicotine products including vaping
    • Firearms
    • Human smuggling
    • Pharmaceuticals without prescription
    • Organs
    • Explosives
    • Narcotics
    • Sexual services
    • Unlicensed medical services
    • Stolen bank accounts etc.

Spam and Misleading Content

YouTube defines spam as content or correspondences that is capable of producing negative experiences which may result in difficulties in searching for relevant and substantive material.[49] All uploaded videos are subjected to the following guidelines on spam:[50]

  • Video Spam
  • Clickbait or misleading thumbnails
  • Scams
  • Incentivization Spam
  • Comments Spam
  • Repetitive comments
  • Live Stream misbehavior

Violent or Dangerous Content

Violent or dangerous content according to YouTube can include harassment and cyberbullying, harmful or dangerous content, incitement to hatred, criminal organizations, graphically violent material, and coronavirus misinformation.[51] This section of YouTube guidelines is extremely controversial and has caused massive uproar and debate from time to time in the Internet ecosystem.

Criticisms of The YouTube Guideline System

Harassment and Cyberbullying

YouTube has a long history of being extremely lenient with its enforcement of harassment and cyberbullying guidelines, especially when the guidelines would affect either popular or rising channels or mainstream media. An example of this would be the former YouTuber called “Leafyishere”. Calvin Lee Vail created the online persona of “Leafyishere” in 2011, originally, he uploaded simple gaming videos, but these videos did not gain much popularity.[52] After a little bit of experimentation, Calvin noticed that if he displayed his gameplay over a voiceover of the discussion of some topic his gameplay would get a lot more attention and views. He would often make reaction videos on smaller channels to make light-hearted fun of them; however, with the growth of his audience and the saturation of the genre of content that he had himself pioneered Leafy now found himself having to sacrifice morality in order to retain relevance and uniqueness. This would mean that Calvin broke a variety of guidelines presented by YouTube such as harassment and bullying, and clickbait guidelines, he would also elaborate upon his experiences with various illegal substances in his videos.[53] Leafy has also inspired countless similar channels to be born in his absence, all of the similar quality; however, they are not under such intense scrutiny as they have to grow a lot more for YouTube to consider them a threat to the YouTube atmosphere. Some similar YouTubers include “GradeAUnderA”, “Birdman”, “Penguinz0”, etc.

Spam and Misleading Content

Spam and misleading content is a section of the YouTube Guidelines that is violated regularly and on a daily basis. This is a section that is treated very lightly and is actively ignored. Some channels have even made an entire career over clickbait thumbnails and titles. Some of these YouTubers are “Sam Pepper”, “RiceGum”, “Morgz”, “5-Minute Crafts” etc. An extreme violation of the spam and misleading content section of YouTube guidelines can be seen in the example of a certain YouTuber named “ImJayStation”. His content would be considered by most people crude, disrespectful, and extremely distasteful. His worst offending series would be his “3 AM” challenges where he would pretend to call recently deceased celebrities or YouTubers.[54] Understandably, this caused massive controversy and the fanbases of the deceased persons would direct their hostility towards ImJayStation.

Keemstar [55]

Incitement to Violence

Daniel M. Keem is the creator of the popular online news channel which is known as “DramaAlert”, and he is more commonly referred to as “Keemstar”. He has misused his platform multiple times over the 10 years he has been on YouTube resulting in more than 12 account terminations.[56] Incitement to violence is an issue that should be taken extremely seriously as it can lead to horrible situations. An example of this is when Daniel takes it upon himself to swat his rivals. Swatting implies calling the police and informing them that a certain person is a threat to society (bombs, terrorism, etc.). Then a SWAT team shows up at the target’s house to determine whether the threats are real or not. One of those swatting attacks happened during his feud with another YouTuber who is called “MundaneMatt”. However, Daniel was allegedly the perpetrator of the attack that could have possibly killed the man. The day after the swatting incident, the FBI paid a visit to Keemstar in order to ask him questions about the swat that took place. [56] Daniel has also swatted more than 2 other YouTubers and has caused many others to receive death threats. Despite this, he has never faced serious repercussions for his actions as he could have potentially killed his victims.

References

  1. ↑ L. Ceci, "YouTube - Statistics & Facts," Statista, [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/topics/2019/youtube/#:~:text=As%20of%202021%2C%20there%20was,aged%2035%20and%2044%20years. [Accessed 28 04 2022]
  2. ↑ J. Clement, "Statista," [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1201880/most-visited-websites-worldwide/. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 ColdFusion, "How did youtube start," YouTube, [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4dT-lW9260. [Accessed 28 4 2022].
  4. ↑ J. Hopkins, "Surprise! There's a third YouTube co-founder," USA today, [Online]. Available: https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/news/2006-10-11-youtube-karim_x.htm . [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 J. Karim, "Me at the zoo," Youtube, [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNQXAC9IVRw. [Accessed 28 4 2022].
  6. ↑ T. Realm, "Me at the zoo wasn't the first video," [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EurHP1DCJg. [Accessed 28 4 2022].
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 L. Downey, "Google's Incredible YouTube Purchase 15 Years Later," Investopedia, [Online]. Available: https://www.investopedia.com/google-s-incredible-youtube-purchase-15-years-later-5200225#:~:text=Google%20purchased%20YouTube%20for%20%241.65,nearly%2011%25%20to%20overall%20revenue. . [Accessed 28 04 2022]
  8. ↑ "https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312506206884/dex991.htm," [Online]. Available: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312506206884/dex991.htm. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  9. ↑ https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/New_York_Southern_District_Court/1--07-cv-02103/Viacom_International_Inc._et_al_v._Youtube_Inc._et_al/1/. [Accessed 28 4 2022]
  10. ↑ AFP, "Judge orders Google to give YouTube user data to Viacom," web archive, [Online]. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20100702111029/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gvFPgT3MNrzaN7r-Y37eFI-qv4bA. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  11. ↑ M. Sweney, "Google and Viacom reach deal over Youtube user data," [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2008/jul/15/googlethemedia.digitalmedia. [Accessed 28 04 2022]
  12. ↑ "Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al, 1:07-cv-02103, No. 364 (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2010)," docket alarm, [Online]. Available: https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/New_York_Southern_District_Court/1--07-cv-02103/Viacom_International_Inc._et_al_v._Youtube_Inc._et_al/364/. [Accessed 28 04 2022]
  13. ↑ contributor, "YouTube launches Revenue Sharing Partners Program, but no pre rolls," tech crunch, [Online]. Available: https://techcrunch.com/2007/05/04/youtube-launches-revenue-sharing-partners-program-but-no-pre-rolls/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAMiUjcpRSPEJm-EJEG72-8VLxtgvoqxHYCILgrpEjcV5WNk6YV1xmDCKHWRzaLf8bVzBzK2a. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 T. G. Theorists, "They stole $1.7 million," [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACNhHTqIVqk. [Accessed 28 04 2022]
  15. ↑ 15.0 15.1 S. Hollister, "YouTube opens Partner program to all: every creator in 20 countries can now monetize video," verge, [Online]. Available: https://www.theverge.com/2012/4/13/2945243/youtube-partner-program-monetization. [Accessed 28 4 2022
  16. ↑ T. Spangler, "YouTube Tops 2 Million Creators in Ad-Revenue Sharing Program," variety, [Online]. Available: https://variety.com/2021/digital/news/youtube-partner-program-2-million-creators-1235045674/. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  17. ↑ G. support, "Multi-Channel Network (MCN) overview for YouTube Creators," Google support, [Online]. Available: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2737059?hl=en. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  18. ↑ A. padilla, "My thoughts about SMOSH/Defy Media shutting down," [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_zuDvgfULw. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  19. ↑ N. McAlone, "YouTube star PewDiePie rages against media 'attack' following reports of anti-Semitic jokes in his videos," Business Insider, [Online]. Available: https://www.businessinsider.com/pewdiepie-response-to-report-2017-2. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  20. ↑ B. Savino, "The Rise of Gaming on YouTube," [Online]. Available: https://emorywheel.com/the-rise-of-gaming-on-youtube/. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  21. ↑ N. McAlone, "YouTube star PewDiePie rages against media 'attack' following reports of anti-Semitic jokes in his videos," Business Insider, [Online]. Available: https://www.businessinsider.com/pewdiepie-response-to-report-2017-2. [Accessed 28 04 2022]
  22. ↑ "Pepsi Pulls Ad Accused of Trivializing Black Lives Matter," NY times, [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/05/business/kendall-jenner-pepsi-ad.html. [Accessed 28 04 2022]
  23. ↑ hankschannel, "35 Minutes on YouTube Demonetization," [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouMeAaAWUEg. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  24. ↑ J. Swearingen, "Logan Paul Posts Footage of Apparent Suicide Victim on YouTube," Intelligencer, [Online]. Available: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018/01/logan-paul-suicide-forest-video-youtube.html. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  25. ↑ J. Graham, "YouTube's stricter ad rules still wouldn't have stopped Logan Paul's 'suicide forest' video," Talking Tech, [Online]. Available: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/tech/talkingtech/2018/01/16/youtubes-stricter-ad-rules-still-wouldnt-have-stopped-logan-pauls-suicide-forest-video/1038758001/ . [Accessed 28 04 2022]
  26. ↑ MattsWhatitis, "We are Happening, Youtube is Listening, Media is Listening, We are Winning EVENING STREAM," [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LYHn3laNbc. [Accessed 28 04 2022]
  27. ↑ J. Alexander, "YouTube is disabling comments on almost all videos featuring children," the verge, [Online]. Available: https://www.theverge.com/2019/2/28/18244954/youtube-comments-minor-children-exploitation-monetization-creators. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  28. ↑ 28.0 28.1 G. Jarboe, "YouTube Shorts: An Introductory Guide," Search Engine Journal, [Online]. Available: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/youtube-shorts-guide/382267/#close. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  29. ↑ A. Chakravarti, "A year since TikTok ban, Indian TikTokers narrate how their lives were impacted," [Online]. Available: https://www.indiatoday.in/technology/features/story/a-year-since-tiktok-ban-indian-tiktokers-narrate-how-their-lives-were-impacted-1823024-2021-07-02#:~:text=TikTok%2C%20the%20short%2Dvideo%20platform,2020%2C%20over%20national%20security%20issues. [Accessed 28 04 2022].
  30. ↑ YouTube - Statistics & Facts. Statista. Available at https://www.statista.com/topics/2019/youtube/#:~:text=As%20of%202021%2C%20there%20was,aged%2035%20and%2044%20years
  31. ↑ Stephanie Morse.YouTube: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly. ACPC Psychology. Available at https://www.statista.com/topics/2019/youtube/#:~:text=As%20of%202021%2C%20there%20was,aged%2035%20and%2044%20years
  32. ↑ Neal Mohan. A Look at 2022: Community, Collaboration, and Commerce. YouTube Official Blog. Available at https://blog.youtube/inside-youtube/innovations-for-2022-at-youtube/
  33. ↑ Regueira, U., Alonso-Ferreiro, A., & Da-Vila, S. Women on youtube: Representation and participation through the web scraping technique. . Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal. Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1249381
  34. ↑ Jelissa Burns . How YouTube is changing education.The Advance-Titan. Available at https://advancetitan.com/news/2020/12/09/how-youtube-is-changing-education
  35. ↑ Karen Hua. Education as Entertainment: YouTube Sensations Teaching The Future. Forbes. Available at https://www.forbes.com/sites/karenhua/2015/06/23/education-as-entertainment-youtube-sensations-teaching-the-future/
  36. ↑ KHAN ACADEMY. Available at https://tgstat.com/channel/@khan_academy_maths Accessed 28-04-2022
  37. ↑ KHAN Academy Impact. KHAN Academy. Available at https://www.khanacademy.org/about/impact#
  38. ↑ Khan Academy YouTube Channel Statistics. Vidooly. Available at https://www.khanacademy.org/about/impact#
  39. ↑ Educatorstechnology. Best Math YouTube channels. Educational Technology and Mobile Learning. https://www.educatorstechnology.com/2012/10/8-great-youtube-channels-for-math.html
  40. ↑ Francesco Ricci and Lior Rokach and Bracha Shapira. Introduction to Recommender Systems Handbook. Recommender Systems Handbook, Springer, 2011, pp. 1-35. Available at http://www.inf.unibz.it/~ricci/papers/intro-rec-sys-handbook.pdf
  41. ↑ Rico Hermann . Consumers' Perception of Online Video Advertising. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344452139_Consumers'_Perception_of_Online_Video_Advertising
  42. ↑ Andrew Hutchinson. New Report Finds YouTube Facilitated 394,000 Full-Time Equivalent Jobs in the US in 2020. Social Media Today. Available at https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/new-report-finds-youtube-facilitated-394000-full-time-equivalent-jobs-in-t/607807/
  43. ↑ Estimated annual earnings of selected YouTube channel creators in 2021. Statista. Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/373772/youtubers-monetization-earnings-celebrity/#
  44. ↑ L. Ceci. YouTube - Statistics & Facts. Statista. Available at https://www.statista.com/topics/2019/youtube/#topicHeader__wrapper
  45. ↑ "Using technology to more consistently apply age restrictions," YouTube Official Blog, 22 September 2020. [Online]. Available: https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/using-technology-more-consistently-apply-age-restrictions/. [Accessed 3 April 2022].
  46. ↑ "Firearms policy," YouTube Help, [Online]. Available: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/7667605?hl=en. [Accessed 3 April 2022].
  47. ↑ "Sale of illegal or regulated goods or services policies," YouTube Help, [Online]. Available: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9229611?hl=en. [Accessed 3 April 2022].
  48. ↑ "8 facts about gun control in the US," DW, [Online]. Available: https://www.dw.com/en/8-facts-about-gun-control-in-the-us/a-40816418. [Accessed 28 April 2022].
  49. ↑ "Manage spam in comments," YouTube Help, [Online]. Available: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/9482362?hl=en. [Accessed 3 April 2022].
  50. ↑ Spam, deceptive practices, & scams policies," YouTube Help, [Online]. Available: https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2801973?hl=en&ref_topic=9282365. [Accessed 3 April 2022].
  51. ↑ "Community Guidelines," YouTube, [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/howyoutubeworks/policies/community-guidelines/. [Accessed 3 April 2022].
  52. ↑ "Community Guidelines," YouTube, [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/howyoutubeworks/policies/community-guidelines/. [Accessed 3 April 2022].
  53. ↑ "YouTube Terminates LeafyIsHere’s Channel For Repeated Violations Of Harassment Policies," tubefilter, 24 August 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.tubefilter.com/2020/08/24/youtube-leafy-channel-terminated/. [Accessed 3 April 2022].
  54. ↑ "ImJayStation," Wikitubia, [Online]. Available: https://youtube.fandom.com/wiki/ImJayStation. [Accessed 3 April 2022].
  55. ↑ "Keemstar," Know Your Meme, [Online]. Available: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/people/keemstar. [Accessed 28 April 2022].
  56. ↑ 56.0 56.1 "DramaAlert," Wikitubia, [Online]. Available: https://youtube.fandom.com/wiki/DramaAlert. [Accessed 3 April 2022].
Retrieved from "https://wiki.itcollege.ee/index.php?title=The_History_And_Impact_Of_YouTube&oldid=141968"