Talk:OpenSSH: võtmetega autentimine: Difference between revisions

From ICO wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
DSA ei ole turvalisem kui RSA. [http://superuser.com/questions/13164/what-is-better-for-gpg-keys-rsa-or-dsa RSA vs DSA '09]
Summary is done correctly, with full guidance on the use of this functionality. Only thing that could have been changed is the examples of the code itself, to the way it could have been copied directly into shell. This means removing dollar signs, comments and messages returned from the execution. They could be added separately.
--[[User:Itamm|Itamm]] 23:34, 29 April 2010 (EEST)
In addition I can say that SSH public key is very useful when you need to automate some process. For example copying some files from one sever to another using '''CRON'''. One thing needed to be remembered, is that for the first time it's needed to be done manually, because SSH requires a password.
 
On küll. RSA lahtitegemiseks on praegusel ajal väga head süsteemid. Uurisin selle kohta ekstra infot. Palun viita usaldusväärsemale allikale.  
 
[[User:msikk|Msikk]] 16:02, 30 April 2010 (EEST)
 
Ja sinu usaldusväärsed allikad on millised? --[[User:Itamm|Itamm]] 00:34, 01 May 2010 (EEST)

Latest revision as of 08:59, 9 May 2010

Summary is done correctly, with full guidance on the use of this functionality. Only thing that could have been changed is the examples of the code itself, to the way it could have been copied directly into shell. This means removing dollar signs, comments and messages returned from the execution. They could be added separately. In addition I can say that SSH public key is very useful when you need to automate some process. For example copying some files from one sever to another using CRON. One thing needed to be remembered, is that for the first time it's needed to be done manually, because SSH requires a password.